Computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy: Classification and relevance of false positives
[ad_1]
Dr Prateek Sharma
Dr Sharma has been at the forefront and a pioneer in improving the diagnosis and management of GI diseases and cancer, specifically GERD, Barrett’s esophagus, advanced imagi LESS
… MORE
The study focused on computer-aided detection (CADe) during colonoscopy, a procedure to detect potential issues in the colon. Sometimes, CADe mistakenly identifies things that are not problematic, called false positives (FPs), which can make the examination longer. The aim was to understand why these FPs occur and how much they affect the procedure.
Researchers analyzed videos from colonoscopies to figure out why CADe might misidentify things. They found that most FPs happened because of things that looked odd on the colon’s surface or due to things inside the colon. However, these FPs usually didn’t need much extra time to check, only about 4.8 seconds each, which is around 1% more time in the entire procedure. Most FPs weren’t serious, and doctors quickly knew they were false alarms.
The study concluded that although CADe often makes mistakes during colonoscopies, these errors usually don’t slow down the procedure much. Most false alarms are due to minor issues that doctors can easily identify and dismiss. Therefore, even though false positives happen frequently, they don’t significantly impact the overall time of the colonoscopy.
Read full research: Computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy: Classification and relevance of false positives
Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author’s own.
END OF ARTICLE
[ad_2]
Source link